|
Of all the modern attributes the writer was wary most
of all with greed and power.
Oh, yes, greed and power. The writer
must come to grips with greed and power. To simply admit that
these things existed but were beneath contempt was not
enough. To surrender to them was not enough. Why, he
asked, have human beings accepted the nature of greed as an
axiom, as a good thing, as a value, when so much of history
is a struggle against greed? And yet, as greed became a
normal function of daily life it became something else. The
world progressed. And it only progressed when
stimulated to do so.
In history, anything past the lower working
classes was greed. But the moderns had produced another sort of history
and ways to measure value had to change as well. A man was
greedy if his capital was not being used intelligently.
In a wistful moment, with no money in the bank, the writer
asked, isn't the question one of vitality of spirit? The
presence of greed as a pervasive fact of daily life reduced
the desire of the self to do magnificent things human
nature was capable of. But if everything was bought and sold and the buyers
existed at the highest level in a stratosphere of power only
a few could enter what incentive was there to do the simple, provocative
things human beings had always done? And to do those things at the
highest level possible?
|
|||